Видео

John higgins is an awesome player BUT i can't get over the fact he wanted to cheat. He only didn't do it because he got caught before doing it. Still doesn't make it right. The intention was definitely there for all to see

Williams in 2003 reached a very high level imo.. probably the highest of that decade. Hendry in patches of 02 and 03 too

​@@sugs1191agreed, williams of 2003 reached the highest heights ever in the game imo, even above Hendry of mid 90s and Ronnie 2008-12.

If you think it works that way, then it's not a good image for you.

@@alanunaiomen5306 I asked a question. And it does seem true, Ronnie requires John to be below his best to beat him. Whenever John is playing his best or both are playing their best, John always seems to beat him. This match is evidence and so is their most recent masters match.

@@Ganstaz003 Again it doesn't work that way. Why you assume Ronnie played his best this game? Maybe this was Higgins' best play vs Ronnie's worst, and it still was very close in the end. Of course that's not true, but I just showed you how you can interpret such a thing to fit your narative. John Higgins is a legend of the game and a great player himself. I would rank him 3-5 after O'Sullivan and Hendry. Peak Ronnie is also not a time period necesarry, as people who have watched snooker for years know that Ronnie unfortunately hasn't been the most profesional player, especially in the 2000s. And as you probably know by now, Ronnie at his best is a beast, he just gives you no chance. When in a sport like tennis let's say, number 100 in the world beats number 3 in the world. Do you then think that number 100 in the world at his best is better than number 3? Or a small team from second division beats a team from first division. Does it mean that team is better? Of course not. Teams/people have bad days. Their oponents have good days. You can't just see a match and decide after just a match who the better player is. Form is also an extremely important thing. Fluke/luck plays a part as well in snooker, soccer, etc. Even in chess it can play a part.. if you are unlucky enough to enter a line that your opponent has prepared very well (and this things do happen sometimes). Also you have to look at someone career, trophies, direct results etc. but in the long run. English is not my first language so I am sorry for the mistakes i've made or if this is hard to understand because how i phrased it, but i hope you get it.

Please watch the 1985 embassy world Champion which was decided on final black and moreover Denis was trailing 0-8. championships

@@AnilSingh-nl4ok that's s classic too

@@gurdeepchumber2764 you agree

This is Higgins at his prime as well.

@@brettharrison837 Higgins is a cheat.he should have been banned for good

Agreed. Imagine 11 times winner lol

Hunter did in 2004 watch it , you won't lose your time :)